Legal Research Software That Starts Inside the Case File
Legal research software usually lives outside your matters: you leave the file, run searches, and paste findings back in. Caseagent researches from inside the case file and drafts issue-first memos where every authority carries a [VERIFY] flag until an attorney confirms it.
Research that starts from the issues in your file
The agent has already read the matter, so research doesn't start with a blank query box. It starts with the legal issues your file actually raises. That's the point of putting the researcher inside legal case management software instead of beside it.
AI can invent citations. Here is how we treat that.
Courts have sanctioned lawyers for filing briefs with AI-invented cases. We designed the research feature around that failure mode instead of pretending it doesn't exist.
01
Never cites unverified authority
The agent does not present any case, statute, or regulation as settled. Every authority it surfaces is marked [VERIFY] and listed for attorney confirmation before it can be used in a draft.
02
Reasoning shown, not asserted
Memos separate what the file says (facts you can check against your own documents) from what the law may be (flagged findings). You always see which is which.
03
The attorney is the checkpoint
A research memo from Caseagent is a starting point for a licensed attorney, not legal advice and not a finished brief. That review step is built into the workflow, not left to habit. See how the agent loop works.
What a research memo looks like
An excerpt in the memo's format. This is a product illustration built on a fictional sample matter: the parties, facts, and authorities below are invented to show the structure, including how [VERIFY] flags appear.
Rodriguez v. Hale Trucking (fictional sample matter) · Issue 2 of 4
Product illustration · fictional matter and authorities · not legal advice
Standalone research tools vs research in the file
Standalone legal research AI is genuinely good. The trade-off is where it lives, and what it can see.
| Tool | Public price anchor | Research strength | Sees your case file |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoCounsel | ~$225–$500/user/mo | Strong, purpose-built research AI | Only what you upload per task; no matters, deadlines, or client comms |
| Harvey | Enterprise-only, no public pricing | Powerful, priced for BigLaw | Not built as case management |
| Clio / MyCase AI features | $39–$139/user/mo + add-ons | Chat-style assistance; thin research | Yes, but the AI doesn't work the file |
| Caseagent early access | Planned: $149–$899/mo per firm | Issue-first memos, every authority [VERIFY]-flagged | Yes, it researches from inside the matter |
If your firm already lives in a research platform, keep it. The question Caseagent answers is different: what happens when the researcher has already read the whole matter, including the chronology and issue list, and files its memo next to the documents it cites. Planned tiers are on the pricing page.
What is legal research software?
Legal research software helps lawyers find and analyze case law, statutes, and regulations relevant to a legal question. Traditional tools are search databases; newer AI research tools read a question and return analysis with cited authorities.
Caseagent's version is legal research built into case management: the agent researches the issues raised by a specific matter and files an issue-first memo inside it, with every authority flagged for attorney verification. It's a research aid for licensed attorneys, not legal advice.
Research memos from inside your matters
Caseagent is in early access. Join the list and we'll email you the moment your spot opens. Early users lock in launch pricing.