Skip to content

Litigation Management Software

Litigation management software has to keep a case posture-ready through pleadings, discovery, motions, depositions, and trial. Caseagent puts an AI agent inside each litigation file to compute the deadlines, draft discovery requests and responses, and research the law with every citation flagged for verification.

Exhibit A The workflow

Five phases, one docket, no slack

Litigation is a calendar with a case attached. Every phase generates documents to read, papers to draft, and dates that other dates depend on. The agent works all three, and you review before anything matters.

01
Pleadings. Complaint or answer drafted from the file; service and responsive-pleading deadlines computed the moment the case opens.
PLEADINGS
02
Discovery. Interrogatories, requests for production, and responses drafted from what the file actually says; response clocks tracked per request set.
DISCOVERY
03
Motions. Motion and opposition outlines with supporting research memos; briefing schedules and hearing dates on the timeline.
MOTIONS
04
Depositions. Outline prep from the chronology: what each witness touched, what the documents say, what needs pinning down.
DEPOSITIONS
05
Trial. Pretrial disclosures, exhibit and witness lists, and the pretrial-order dates, all counted back from the trial date.
TRIAL
Exhibit B Docket discipline

Deadline computation is the spine of the case

Litigation deadlines cascade: a continued hearing or an amended scheduling order moves everything downstream. Keeping that cascade straight by hand is where dockets break, which is why litigators buy legal calendaring and docketing software before almost anything else.

Every date in the file gets found. Scheduling orders, notices, and rule-based clocks: the agent extracts dates as documents arrive and computes the dependent deadlines onto one matter timeline.

Reminders escalate until a human confirms. A deadline is never silently marked handled. The agent keeps escalating until someone at the firm confirms it, because calendaring errors are the most preventable malpractice trigger there is.

Court rules vary; verification stays with you. Computed dates are a docketing aid checked against the file, and the attorney verifies them against local rules before relying on them. The full mechanics are on the legal deadline calculator and tracking page.

Illustrative timeline · fictional matter

D1
Answer served Mar 02: discovery responses due Apr 01.
COMPUTED
D2
Amended scheduling order arrives: expert disclosures and dispositive-motion cutoff shift; the agent recomputes both and flags the change.
RECOMPUTED
D3
Opposition brief due in 7 days and unconfirmed: reminders escalate daily until an attorney confirms it's handled.
ESCALATING
Exhibit C Drafting

Discovery drafted from the file, not from a form book

Discovery is where litigation hours go to die: high volume, high stakes, mostly assembly. It's exactly the work an agent inside the file is built for. Producing a large collected data set is a separate job with its own tooling, covered in our guide to legal document review software.

01

Requests aimed at your theory

Interrogatories and requests for production drafted from the pleadings and the chronology, targeting the facts your case actually turns on, ready for your cuts and additions.

02

Responses built from the record

First-draft responses and objections keyed to each request, citing what the file contains, with gaps flagged for the attorney instead of papered over.

03

Motion and opposition outlines

Structured outlines with the record cites pulled in, so briefing starts from an organized argument instead of a blank page. See legal drafting software.

04

Deposition prep from the chronology

Witness-by-witness outlines drawn from the documents each witness touched, with the exhibits to walk them through already listed. The chronology behind it comes from AI case file analysis.

Exhibit D Research

Research memos where every citation says: verify me

AI-drafted briefs with invented citations have gotten real lawyers sanctioned. Caseagent's research output is built around that failure mode instead of pretending it away.

Memos, not answers. The agent returns a structured research memo: question presented, short answer, analysis, and authorities, scoped to the motion or issue you're working.

Every authority carries a [VERIFY] flag. Each case, statute, and rule the agent surfaces is explicitly marked for attorney verification before it goes in a brief. The agent never invents case names, and it never treats its own output as checked.

How the memo pipeline works, end to end, is on the legal research software page, and you can see the flags in the research-memo task of the live demo.

MEMO · ILLUSTRATIVE FORMAT

Sample output structure · fictional

RE: Opposition to motion to compel, RFP set two

I. Question presented

II. Short answer

III. Analysis

• Proportionality standard … [VERIFY]

• Burden-shifting cases … [VERIFY]

IV. Authorities to confirm before filing

First-pass work product for attorney review. Not legal advice; the attorney verifies every authority before filing.

EARLY ACCESS · 2026

Run a docket that never surprises you

Join the early-access list and we'll email you when your spot opens. Flat per-firm plans from $149/month on the pricing page; early users lock in launch pricing.

Run the live demo